This order adjourned an appeal arising from a banking dispute until 29.09.2022 for the filing of a reply, as the first respondent filed vakalatnama and other respondents were absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No.113/2022
Between
Dharnendra Developers, through its Proprietor … Appellant/s Mr. Abhishek R. Mutha
V/s.
Housing Development Finance Co-operative Ltd. …Respondent/s & Ors.
Mr Abhishek R. Mutha, Appellant present in person.
Ms. Ketki Minhas, i/b M/s. H & M Legal Associates, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 15/09/2022:-
Respondent No.1 has appeared through Advocate Ms Ketki Minhas who proposes to file a Vakaltnama for the first Respondent. None of the other Respondents appeared despite service of notice and, therefore, they are called absent and set ex-parte.
The learned counsel who proposes to appear for the first Respondent undertakes to file a reply within three weeks with an advance copy to the Appellant who is appearing in person.
Post on 29.09.2022 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj 6
1
Dharnendra Developers
Abhishek R. Mutha
Housing Development Finance Co-operative Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
