In Appeal No.7/2015, the debtor recovered appellate tribunal considered an application for substituted service by newspaper publication for absent respondents in proceedings before the tribunal.
Permission granted for substituted service of summons (notice) via newspaper publication for all absent respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 389/2015 (Substituted Service)
In
Appeal No.7/2015
Between
Indian Bank … Appellant/s V/s. Dinesh Govindji Kotak, …Respondent/s through his Constituted Attorney, Dilip Kathavani & 2 Ors.
Ms Meena Shah, i/b M/s. Anjana Shah & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Ms Pallavi Kulkarni, i/b Ms Anisha Narayana, Advocate for Respondent No. 1(a) to 1(d).
-: Order dated: 15/09/2022:-
M.A. No. 389/2015 is an application for substituted service by
way of publication of notice in the newspapers on the rest of the Respondents who are parties to the proceeding before the D.R.T. is allowed as prayed for.
Post on 09.11.2022 before the Registrar for production of proof of service.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj17
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether substituted service of summons by way of newspaper publication can be allowed for absent respondents in proceedings before the DRT.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indian Bank
Dinesh Govindji Kotak
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
