Bank of Baroda v. Shyam Fibers
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 278/2021 Date: 28.04.2022
Bank of Baroda Vs. Shyam Fibers
Present: Shri Abhay Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ashutosh Kumar Sand, counsel for the appellant, None for the respondent,
The office report dated 27.04.2022 shows that no vakalatnama has been filed by Shri V. K. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent nor any reply on their behalf. The said report further shows that no affidavit of service has been filed. The delay condonation application is pending consideration. Let the respondent file vakalatnama and reply by the next date.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the arguing counsel Shri A. K. Sand is indisposed today, therefore, he is unable to come today before this Tribunal. Hence, he prays for adjournment.
List this case on 25.08.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Shyam Fibers
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court