Vinita Nagpal v. Union of India & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment in a Delhi High Court writ petition; Union of India sought time to take instructions on compliance with an earlier order, and the matter was re-notified for January 2026.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~173
- IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 14991/2024 VINITA NAGPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Mr. Kaushaljeet Kait, Mr. Naved Ahmed, Mr. Daksh Gupta, Ms. Akriti Manubarwala, Advs.
- versus
- UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC and Mr. Nipun Jain, Adv., UOI.
- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R
- % 17.12.2025
CM APPL. 74757/2025 (seeking directions for time bound compliance order dated 16-09-2025)
Learned counsel for the Union of India seeks some time to take instructions. In the circumstances, re-notify on 14.01.2026.
SACHIN DATTA, J
DECEMBER 17, 2025/uk
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinita Nagpal
- respondent
Union of India
Coram
Sachin Datta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sachin Datta
- Order 2 — this page · Sachin Datta
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court