Disposed

Raju Acharya v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC16 Sept 2025W.P.(C)/13693/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petitions sought enforcement of recovery warrants issued by Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission VII (South-West Delhi) against M/s Sainik Welfare Organization India. Following earlier directions in W.P.(C) 6482/2025, the court directed the concerned SDM to take steps on the warrants, attach assets if necessary, and appear in person before the Commission in execution proceedings.

What the court decided

AI extract

Raju Acharya Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Consumer Protection | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~6, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13711/2025 (6) BIPIN KUMAR MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: + W.P.(C) 13315/2025 (25) SANKAR BISWAS .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: + W.P.(C) 13324/2025 (26) PRAMOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: + W.P.(C) 13338/2025 (27) ARINDAM KARMAKAR .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: + W.P.(C) 13348/2025 (28) SOUMENDRA NATH DUTTA .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE OF NCT OFDELHI AND ORS .....Respondent Through: + W.P.(C) 13362/2025

¶2

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:22:05

¶3

(30) NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

¶4

W.P.(C) 13693/2025 (31) RAJU ACHARYA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: versus

¶6

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

¶7

W.P.(C) 13704/2025 (32) SALIL KUMAR MANDAI .....Petitioner Through: versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

¶8

Presence :

¶9

Mr. Kritendra Tiwari, Adv. for petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Shiven Verma, Panel Counsel, GNCTD and Mr. Rudraksh Mathur, Adv.

¶11

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

¶12

CM APPL.56311/2025 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 13711/2025 CM APPL.54792/2025 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 13362/2025 CM APPL.56237/2025 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 13693/2025 CM APPL.56273/2025 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 13704/2025

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

Applications stand disposed of.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:22:05

¶17

W.P.(C) 13711/2025 W.P.(C) 13315/2025 W.P.(C) 13324/2025 W.P.(C) 13338/2025 W.P.(C) 13348/2025 W.P.(C) 13362/2025 W.P.(C) 13693/2025 W.P.(C) 13704/2025

¶18

The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners being aggrieved with the inaction on the part of the respondents in the enforcement of recovery warrants issued by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission VII (South-West Delhi) dated 24.03.2023.

¶19

Attention is drawn to the order/s passed by the concerned Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum VII in this regard. 5. Specific attention is drawn to order/s, whereby recovery warrants were directed to be issued against the judgment debtor / M/s Sainik Welfare Organization India (SWO India Ltd.).

¶20

It is further pointed out that the director of concerned judgment debtor/s has already been in custody in some other case. It is submitted that for the purpose of execution of warrants issued by the District Commission, the concerned SDM is required to take immediate steps to attach the properties of the judgment debtor/s.

¶21

It is pointed out that similar directions have been issued in W.P.(C) 6482/2025 in the order dated 05.08.2025, passed in the said proceedings. The same reads as under:

¶22

“ 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of respondents in the enforcement of recovery warrant issued by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission VII (South-West Delhi).

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:22:05

¶25

2. Attention is drawn to the orders passed by the concerned Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum VII in this regard.

¶26

3. Specific attention is drawn to the fact that the order dated 28.05.2024 refers to the fact that the recovery warrant has been issued to the DM (South-West) but no report has been submitted. The relevant extract of the said order is as under:-

¶27

“Recovery warrant is issued to the DM (South-West) but no report is received.”

¶28

4. Learned counsel for the respondents / concerned SDM states that in the aftermath of the aforesaid order dated 28.05.2024, various notices have been issued to the judgment debtor/s. Further, on 28.05.2025, the SHO, Dwarka, has been directed to arrest the concerned judgment debtor/s.

¶29

5. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the concerned judgment debtor/s have already been in custody in some other case. It is submitted that the respondents / concerned SDM is required to take immediate steps to attach the properties of the concerned judgment debtor/s.

¶30

6. Let the respondents / concerned SDM take requisite steps to attach the assets of the judgment debtor/s.

¶31

7. Let necessary steps be taken by the SDM as expeditiously as possible and let a report in this regard be filed in the ongoing execution proceedings before the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum VII.

¶32

8. The concerned SDM is directed to ensure that the above directions are implemented, and further steps be taken in consonance with the directions in the execution proceedings.

¶33

9. Let the concerned SDM also personally appear in the ongoing execution proceedings before the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum VII.

¶34

10. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of. “

¶35

In line with the aforesaid directions, the concerned SDM is directed to ensure that necessary steps are taken in pursuance of the warrants issued by

¶36

This is a digitally signed order.

¶37

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:22:05

¶38

the District Commission and if necessary, subject to further directions of the District Commission, steps be also taken to attach the assets of the judgment debtor/s.

¶39

Let the concerned SDM also appear in person in the ongoing execution proceedings before the concerned Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

¶40

With the aforesaid directions, the present petitions are disposed of.

¶41

SACHIN DATTA, J

¶42

SEPTEMBER 16, 2025/ cl

¶43

This is a digitally signed order.

¶44

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:22:05

Raju Acharya v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Raju Acharya v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Amarnath Goyal and Anr. Vs the Commissioner MCD and Ors.

Raj Kumar Dhall Vs MCD & Ors.

Gurpreet Singh Vs Govt of NCT Delhi & Ors.

M/S Amazon Distributors (P) Ltd. Vs Gopal Bhardwaj

Naraina Jan Kalyan Sudhar Sanghthan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Shri Aman Malik Advocate Vs Union of India and Ors.

Nafeesa Begum Vs the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.

Mr. Anil Kumar Goel Vs Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- Delhi 10 and Ors.

The Pentecostal Church of God (Full Gospel) - Delhi Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

B M Construction Company Vs Union of India

Ms M L Pratihar Vs Union of India and Anr.

Sankar Biswas Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Vinita Nagpal Vs Union of India & Anr.

Ms 7 Steps Consultores Pvt. Ltd. Vs Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. & Anr.