Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate, which expired on 17.01.2024. The respondent raised no objection; the mandate was extended for nine months from 17.01.2024 with consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Mr. Bankim Garg, Advocates.
versus
M/S RPG INFRATECH ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shivee Pandey, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 13.02.2024
Page 1 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 91/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:41:52
is extended for a period of nine months from 17.01.2024.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 13, 2024 “Bhupi”/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 91/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:41:52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended under Section 29A after its expiry by consent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s MBL Infrastructures Ltd.
M/s RPG Infratech
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
