The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29-A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to conclude proceedings between Malhotra Enterprises and Ericsson India Private Limited.
Extension of Arbitral Tribunal's mandate for six months w.e.f. 10.02.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
MALHOTRA ENTERPRISES
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Gokul J, Mr. Bharath Kumar and Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocates.
versus
ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 12.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:16
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended for six months.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Malhotra Enterprises
Ericsson India Private Limited
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
