Disposed

Biba Apparels Private Limited (Now Known as Biba Fashion Limited) v. Ritu Exports

Delhi HC12 Feb 2024O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/88/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vendor dispute referred to arbitration in 2019; petitioner sought extension of arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A as proceedings reached final hearing. Court extended the mandate till 30th September 2024 and directed no unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the arbitrator extended till 30th September, 2024; exemption application allowed subject to just exceptions.

Biba Apparels Private Limited (Now Known as Biba Fashion Limited)… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~39

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 88/2024 and I.A. 3272/2024

¶4

BIBA APPARELS PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW KNOWN AS BIBA FASHION LIMITED) ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rajat Singh, Mr. Sarthak Chandra & Mr. Arun Pratap Singh Rajawat, Advs. (Mob. No. 9582770047)

¶6

versus

¶7

RITU EXPORTS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi, Adv. (Mob. No. 9730630681)

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

¶10

O R D E R % 12.02.2024

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

I.A.3272/2024 (for exemption)

¶13

This is an application seeking exemption from filing originals/certified/cleared/typed or translated copies of documents, left side margins, electronic documents, etc. Original documents shall be produced/filed, if sought, strictly as per the provisions of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 and the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018.

¶14

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶15

Accordingly, the application is disposed of.

¶16

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM) 88/2024

¶17

This is a petition filed by M/s. BIBA Apparels Private Limited under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension

¶18

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:16

¶19

of mandate of ld. Arbitrator. The dispute between the parties in the present matter pertains to an agreement dated 16th December, 2015 by which the Respondent was registered as a vendor for the Petitioner. Disputes had arisen due to failure of the Respondent in completion of the assignment given by the Petitioner and non-compliance of the contractual obligations. Thus, the matter was referred to Arbitration vide order dated 25th January, 2019. It is seen from the proceeding sheets of the Tribunal that the proceedings are at the stage of final hearing.

¶20

After having perused the dates and chronology of events, it is directed that the mandate of ld. Arbitrator shall stand extended till 30th September, 2024. It is made clear that ld. Arbitrator shall not give unnecessary adjournments to the parties.

¶21

Petition is disposed of.

¶22

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶23

FEBRUARY 12, 2024/ dk/bh

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:16

Biba Apparels Private Limited (Now Known as Biba Fashion Limited) v. Ritu Exports

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Biba Apparels Private Limited (Now Known as Biba Fashion Limited) v. Ritu Exports

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Das Construction Vs Container Corporation of India

Satish Chand Rajesh Kumar Pvt. Ltd. Vs New Delhi Municipal Corporation

National Textile Corporation Limited & Ors. Vs India United Textile Mill Limited

M/S Spg Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. through Mr Rahul Chauhan Ar Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi

M/S Mbl Infrastructures Ltd. Vs M/S Rpg Infratech

Ajanta Soya Limited Vs the Oriental Insurance Company

Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. Vs Ntpc-Bhel Power Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Dsc Limited Vs Union of India (Dgmap)

M/S Das Construction Vs Container Corporation of India

Satish Chand Rajesh Kumar Pvt. Ltd. Vs New Delhi Municipal Corporation

Sameer Paul Chaudhary & Ors. Vs State & Ors.

Gee Internationals Vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.

Lr Marketing and Consulting Group Vs M/S Easyrewardz Software Services Pvt. Ltd.

Makala Infrastructure Limited Vs Pyramid Propmoto LLP & Anr.