Petition under Section 29A for extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate, which had expired after a six-month consent extension. The respondent raised no objection and the award stood reserved. The Court extended the mandate by six months from the order date with parties' consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ZILLION INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Gokul J., Mr. Bharath Kumar S. & Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocates. [M:9312249796]
versus
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Sonali Jain & Mr. Pranav Malhotra, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R % 12.02.2024
Page 1 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 85/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:18
PRATEEK JALAN, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024 ‘pv’/
Page 2 of 2
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 85/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:09:18
1 issue framed by the court
Should the mandate of the arbitral tribunal be extended under Section 29A despite expiry on 12.10.2023?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
