Appeal withdrawn by the appellant after some arguments; the Division Bench disposed of the appeal along with pending applications without deciding any substantive issue.
None; appeal permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
SHRI PARVESH KUMAR BAJAJ .....Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra and Ms. Sneh Somani, Advocates. versus STATE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mehak Nakra, ASC for GNCTD alongwith Mr. Umang Aditya and Mr. Devansh Solanki, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Lalit Gupta and Mr. Priyansh Jain, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 10.07.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JULY 10, 2024 kct
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:57:27
Shri Parvesh Kumar Bajaj
State
R-2
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
