Appeal against dismissal of the plaintiff's application seeking permission to lead evidence via video conferencing after travelling abroad. The Division Bench declined interference, noting the right was not foreclosed and any fresh application would be considered under the Delhi High Court Video Conferencing Rules, 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
JANAK DATWANI .....Appellant
Through: Mr Dhruv Gupta, Advocate.
versus
CNA EXPORTS PVT LTD & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr Vivek Sharma, Advocate for R-1. Mr Bhushan Kapur, Advocate for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R
% 18.07.2024
[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CAV 157/2024
FAO(OS) 40/2024 & CM 19140/2024
“ 5. The applicant/plaintiff got the permission to travel to abroad on 24.02.2024 and he took the flight on 07.03.2024 and if the applicant/plaintiff has the regard for recording of his evidence, he would have moved the application in the interregnum for recording of evidence.
FAO(OS) 40/2024
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 11:57:47
6. Accordingly, at this stage, there is no merit in the present application, which is hereby dismissed. ”
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 18, 2024 rt
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
FAO(OS) 40/2024
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 11:57:47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Division Bench should interfere with the Single Judge's dismissal of the appellant's application to lead evidence via video conferencing.
Janak Datwani
CNA Exports Pvt Ltd
Rajiv Shakdher
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
