Listed for further hearing on 09/08/2024 after Standing Counsel for respondent No.4 was directed to supply the entire paper book to the petitioner's counsel.
Directed Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for respondent No.4, to supply a soft copy of the entire paper book to the learned counsel for the petitioner by tomorrow.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1.
.....Petitioner
MAHESH CHANDRA SAXENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Ashish Chaudhary, Ms. Surbhit Nandan, Mr. Dhruv Gondara and Ms. Nandika Vyas, Advs. versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Garg, (Panel Counsel for GNCTD) with Adv. Mihir Gujjewar, Advs. for R-1 and R-6. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, SC, MCD with Ms. Devika, Adv. Mr. Arjun Pant, Ms. Latika Malhotra, Advs. for DDA. Ms. Sakshi Popli, Advocate For DPCC Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Advs. for DJB.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 05.08.2024
CM APPL. 43313/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:57:18
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
AUGUST 5, 2024 N.Khanna
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/10/2024 at 11:57:18
Mahesh Chandra Saxena
State of NCT Delhi
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
