Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted that the writ petition became infructuous, leading the court to dispose of the petition and pending applications accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TIWARI TOURS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashish Pandey, Mr. Prateek Rai and Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
.....Respondent
Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Priya Mishra (GP), Ms. Pinky Pawar and Mr. Aakash Pathak, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
%
10.07.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JULY 10, 2024 Aj
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:02:09
TIWARI TOURS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
