Public interest writ petition sought an inquiry into Cycle allowance allegedly fraudulently drawn by Delhi Police officials. The Court declined to entertain the PIL but directed the Delhi Police to refer the petitioner's complaint to its auditor for examination during account audits, and closed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
SANSER PAL SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person with Mr. Vinod Kumar Verma, Mr. Manoj Sharma and Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate for UOI. Ms. Aliza Alam, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 09.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 21:23:49
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JULY 9, 2024 js
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 21:23:49
1 issue framed by the court
Should the High Court entertain a public interest petition seeking an inquiry into alleged fraudulent appropriation of Cycle allowance by Delhi Police officials?
Sanser Pal Singh
Union of India and Others
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
