The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit by accepting a settlement application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, decreeing the terms agreed by parties and refunding 50% court fees to the plaintiff.
Suit disposed; parties bound by settlement terms; decree drawn up as per prayer; 50% court fee refund admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
Through: Mr. Rohan Krishna Seth and Mr. Shiv Mehrotra, Advs.
versus
C. VISVALINGAM AND ORS. ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Subramanian and Mr. Bharath Advocates for D-1 & 2.
Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Ms. Ira Singh, Advs. for D-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 12.02.2024
I.A. 3321/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:43:10
early on in the proceedings, the plaintiff is entitled to a refund of 50% of the Court Fees, as per applicable rules.
ANISH DAYAL, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024/MK/ ig
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:43:10
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
