Allowed

Rica S.P.A v. M/S. Skin Safe Industries through Its Sole Proprietor & Ors.

Delhi HC13 Feb 2024CS(COMM)/85/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court passed a consent decree in a commercial suit between RICA S.P.A and M/s. Skin Safe Industries based on a compromise filed jointly. The court found the terms lawful and decreed the suit accordingly while also ordering a refund of court fee.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of the compromise; Registry directed to issue court fee refund certificate to Plaintiff's counsel.

Rica S.P.A Vs M/S. Skin Safe Industries through Its Sole… — Company and Corporate | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~14

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CS(COMM) 85/2022 & I.A. 2044/2022

¶4

RICA S.P.A

¶5

Through: Mr. Kapil Kr. Giri, Advocate with Mr. Lakshay Sharma, Ms. Sakshi Bhasin, Advocates for Mr. Aayushmaan Gauba, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S. SKIN SAFE INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Shlok Suden, Advocate.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶9

O R D E R % 13.02.2024

¶10

I.A. No. 3459/2024 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed jointly by the parties)

¶11

This is a joint application on behalf of the parties seeking a consent decree as per terms of compromise enumerated in paragraph No. 2 of the application.

¶12

The aforenoted application is duly supported by affidavits of the Authorized Representatives of the parties. Counsel mentioned in the appearance above, confirm the compromise and pray that the suit be decreed in terms thereof.

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:39:45

¶14

The Court has perused the terms of the compromise, as recorded in paragraph No. 2 of the application, and finds the same to be lawful.

¶15

Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in favour of Plaintiff and against the Defendants in terms of paragraph No. 55(i) to (iv) of the plaint, read along with the compromise terms mentioned in paragraph No. 2 of the application, which shall form part of the decree. Parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the compromise.

¶16

Decree sheet be drawn up.

¶17

In paragraph No. 5(ii) of the application, which is duly signed by the Plaintiff and is supported by an affidavit, it is prayed that court fee be refunded in the name of Plaintiff’s counsel. Accordingly, Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of court fee to the Plaintiff in the name of their counsel.

¶18

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶19

FEBRUARY 13, 2024 sapna

¶20

Rica S.P.A v. M/S. Skin Safe Industries through Its Sole Proprietor & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rica S.P.A v. M/S. Skin Safe Industries through Its Sole Proprietor & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Securitas Ab Vs C. Visvalingam and Anr.

Smt Kanwal Jeet Kaur Bawa Vs Punjab and Sind Bank

Pfizer Products, Inc. Vs Paval Garg & Ors.

Aditya Infotech Limited Vs Dipankar Mandal

Zed Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. Vs Hardik Mukeshbhai Pansheriya & Ors.

Louis Vuitton Malletier Vs M/S Capichino/Capture & Ors.

Adani Wilmar Ltd. Vs Emami Agrotech Limited & Ors.

Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited Vs Sain Medicaments Pvt. Ltd.

Fibrocell Technologies Inc. Vs Controller of Patents

Maharashi Patanjali Vidya Mandir Samiti Vs Registrar of Trademarks

Pfizer Products, Inc. Vs Paval Garg & Ors.

Jockey International Inc. Vs M/S Femi & Ors.

Alere Switzerland Gmbh Vs Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and Anr.

Smt. Kum Kum Kapoor & Anr. Vs M/S. Madhu Sanitations & Ors.