Appeal dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered in this order.
Present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
Through: Mr. Tanveer Malhotra, Advocate ( through VC )
versus
CONTROLLER OF PATENTS ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, (CGSC) with Mr. Zubin Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 14.02.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
FEBRUARY 14, 2024/RK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:40:27
Nektar Therapeutics
Controller of Patents
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
