Allowed

Jockey International Inc. v. M/S Femi & Ors.

Delhi HC13 Feb 2024CS(COMM)/130/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Joint application for consent decree in a commercial suit. Court found terms of settlement lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement, allowing seizure products disposal and platform access.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in favour of Plaintiff against Defendants 1-5; seized goods inspected/donated; Defendants freed from account blocks on Flipkart; Court fees refunded.

Jockey International Inc. Vs M/S Femi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~20

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 130/2023 & IA 4611/2023

¶4

JOCKEY INTERNATIONAL INC ..... Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Appearance not given.

¶6

versus

¶7

M/S FEMI & ORS. ..... Defendants

¶8

Through: Mr. Shaikh Bakhtiyar, Advocate

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶11

O R D E R % 13.02.2024

¶12

IA. 3341/2024 (Order XXIII Rule 3 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908) and CS(COMM) 130/2023

¶13

This is a joint application on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant Nos.15, under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking a decree on consent terms.

¶14

The parties have resolved the disputes, which are subject matter of the present suit, and the terms of settlement has been enumerated in paragraph 2(i) to 2(x) of the application. Parties gave agreed for the suit to be decreed in terms of prayer as mentioned in paragraph 4 of the application. The application is duly supported by affidavits of authorized representative of Plaintiff and affidavits of Defendants No.1-5. The counsels present in the proceedings have identified the signatures of their clients and confirmed the

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:39:42

¶17

terms of settlement and seek a consent decree accordingly.

¶18

The Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful.

¶19

Accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant Nos. 1-5 in terms of the settlement delineated in the application. The decree shall be passed in favour of the Plaintiff in terms of Paragraph 44 (a)- 44 (d) of the plaint read with the terms of settlement in the application which shall form part of the decree.

¶20

With respect to the infringing goods which were seized by the Local Commissioner, the same shall be inspected by the representative of the Plaintiff and the goods which are found to be genuine, supported by the purchase bills, can be utilised by the Defendants. As regards the Infringing goods, the Plaintiff shall remove the tags/label/logos on them and thereafter donate the same to any NGO.

¶21

The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement as recorded in the application.

¶22

In view of the fact that parties have arrived at a settlement, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate for refund of full Court fees, in favour of the Plaintiff.

¶23

This Court vide order dated 7^th March, 2023, had directed Defendant

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:39:42

¶25

No. 6, Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd., to block the Flipkart accounts of Defendant Nos. 1-5. However, with the resolution of disputes between the parties and the Defendant No.1-5’s undertaking to not sell any infringing goods of the Plaintiff, it is clarified that Defendant Nos. 1-5 shall now be free to create a new account on Defendant No. 6 platform..

¶26

The suit is decreed in the above terms. Decree sheet be drawn up.

¶27

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶28

FEBRUARY 13, 2024 ab

¶29

This is a digitally signed order.

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 16:39:42

Jockey International Inc. v. M/S Femi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jockey International Inc. v. M/S Femi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Securitas Ab Vs C. Visvalingam and Anr.

Smt Kanwal Jeet Kaur Bawa Vs Punjab and Sind Bank

Pfizer Products, Inc. Vs Paval Garg & Ors.

Aditya Infotech Limited Vs Dipankar Mandal

Zed Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. Vs Hardik Mukeshbhai Pansheriya & Ors.

Louis Vuitton Malletier Vs M/S Capichino/Capture & Ors.

Adani Wilmar Ltd. Vs Emami Agrotech Limited & Ors.

Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited Vs Sain Medicaments Pvt. Ltd.

Fibrocell Technologies Inc. Vs Controller of Patents

Maharashi Patanjali Vidya Mandir Samiti Vs Registrar of Trademarks

Pfizer Products, Inc. Vs Paval Garg & Ors.

Rica S.P.A Vs M/S. Skin Safe Industries through Its Sole Proprietor & Ors.

Alere Switzerland Gmbh Vs Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and Anr.

Smt. Kum Kum Kapoor & Anr. Vs M/S. Madhu Sanitations & Ors.