Plaintiff sought permanent injunction against a printing concern imprinting its CP PLUS marks on counterfeit surveillance products. Defendant consented to decree without damages. Suit decreed in Plaintiff's favour with permanent injunction and full court fee refund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
ADITYA INFOTECH LIMITED ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Shantanu Sahay, Ms. Imon Roy, Ms. Shreya Shukla, Ms. Vareesha Irfan and Mr. Pratyush, Advocates.
versus
DIPANKAR MANDAL ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Mohit Bangwal, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 09.02.2024
I.A. 17871/2023 (under Order XIII-A Rules 3 and 6(1)(a) r/w Order VIII Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of CPC on behalf of Plaintiff)
Plaintiff’s registered marks “CP PLUS”/ and on unbranded poor-quality products without authorisation, enabling them to be sold as counterfeit products.
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:47:21
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:47:21
through compromise effected in Court. Registry is directed to issue a certificate for refund of full Court fees, in favour of Plaintiff.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:47:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Defendant's defence had tenable prospects so as to preclude summary judgment for trademark infringement.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Aditya Infotech Limited
Dipankar Mandal
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
