The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to approach the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum regarding claims for electricity connection due to ambiguity about property occupancy.
Petitioner directed to approach the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
JEET KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ashish Negi, Adv.
versus
BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Yash Srivastava and Ms. Shiksha Jha, Advs.
CORAM:
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:58:56
Grievance Redressal Forum [“ CGRF ”], if the petitioner takes up appropriate application before the said authority.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 13, 2024/p
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/08/2024 at 12:58:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's eligibility for electricity connection based on property occupancy can be examined by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeet Kumar & Ors.
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
