Writ petitioner, appointed as a Short Service Commission Officer during pendency, sought leave to withdraw her petition. The application was allowed and the writ petition was disposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on its merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC with Mr.Srish Kumar Mishra & Mr.Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R % 12.08.2024
CM APPL. 46180/2024 (withdrawal of petition)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:42:57
REKHA PALLI, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
AUGUST 12, 2024 kk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2024 at 11:42:57
Vishakha Arya
Union of India & Ors.
Rekha Palli
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
