The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the suit had been decreed by the Trial Court, rendering the petition infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Himanshu Jain, Mr. Siddhanth Jain, Mr. Noman Jain, Advocates.
versus
AJAY KUMAR JAIN
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
MANOJ JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 3, 2024/ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/09/2024 at 12:16:08
Sunita Thareja
Ajay Kumar Jain
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
