Dismissed
Manak Chand v. Dayawanti
Delhi HCRFA/33/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
An appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared for the appeal. No substantive legal issue or principle is established in this thin order.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R-14
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RFA 33/2016
¶4
MANAK CHAND
¶5
.....Appellant
¶6
Through: None.
¶7
versus
¶8
DAYAWANTI
¶9
.....Respondent
¶10
Through: None.
¶11
CORAM:
¶12
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 12.08.2024
¶13
- None appears for the parties. None had appeared on 02.07.2024, 15.07.2024, 22.07.2024 and 29.07.2024 as well.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Manak Chand
- respondent
Dayawanti
Coram
AI extract
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court