Petitioner exhausted by non-appearance in a second round hearing; High Court dismissed writ petition and pending applications for want of prosecution.
Instant petition along with pending applications dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
IMRAN KHAN .....Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Mr. Samyak Jain, Ms. Drishti Saraf, Ms. Pragya Upadhyay, Advocates. Mr. Anand Baksh, Ms. Varsha Arya, Mr. Satbeer, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 12.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 12, 2024/KG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 12:09:40
IMRAN KHAN
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
