Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of parties at multiple hearings. No arguments were submitted.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-19
PICCADILY HOTELS PVT LTD
.....Appellant
Through: None.
versus
SHAOLIN VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS
.....Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 12.08.2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 12, 2024/KG
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/08/2024 at 12:57:34
Piccadily Hotels Pvt Ltd
Shaolin Visual Communications
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
