Petitioners withdrew writ petition regarding alleged unauthorized constructions in Delhi shops, seeking liberty to approach the Special Task Force of DDAGRC. Court granted liberty but dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to approach Special Task Force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
MAZHAR ALI AND ANR. ..... Petitioners
Through: Ms. Parul Dureja, Adovcate.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, Advocate for R- 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 08.02.2019 CM APPL. No. 6116/2019 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P. (C) No. 1346/2019 & CM APPL. NO. 6115/2019 (for interim relief)
The petitioners are aggrieved by alleged unauthorized construction in shops bearing Nos. 61, 63, 64, 65, 93 & 94 Murga Market, near Ghode Wala Mandir, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi and Shop No. M-144, situate at Shivaji Market, Near Goan Wala Chowk, Raghubir Nagar, New Delhi.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners have made representations to the concerned authorities, including respondent No.1/SDMC, the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) and the Lt. Governor of Delhi in this regard, however to no avail.
Learned standing counsel appears for respondent No.1/SDMC on
advance copy and states that there have been complaints and countercomplaints in relation to properties in the area in which the subject property is situate; and that respondent No.1 has booked the properties and action is underway in some of the complaints.
In view of the statement made by counsel for respondent No.1/SDMC, counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the Special Task Force set-up by the Delhi Development Authority vide Office Memorandums dated 25.04.2018 and 23.05.2018 issued under directions of the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677/1985 titled M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India & Ors.
Liberty as prayed for is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.
FEBRUARY 08, 2019 Pallavi
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mazhar Ali and Anr.
South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
