Neither substantive issue was addressed in this order. The court deferred the hearing, allowing the petitioner time to produce documents and listed the matters for a later date.
Time granted to produce documents; matter listed for 07.02.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32 & 42
AIRCON TECHNIQUE PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Kumar and Mr Sanjay Agnihotri, Advocates.
versus
CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Jayant Bhatt, Ms Prachi Aggarwal, Advocate for R-1 to R-4.
AND
+ W.P.(C) 215/2019 & CM No. 1007/2019
ADVANCE EPC CONTRACTS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Kumar and Mr Sanjay Agnihotri, Advocates.
versus
CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Pratyush Miglani, Advocate for R-1 and R-4/CPWD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 11.01.2019
respondent no.1.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 11, 2019 MK
Aircon Technique Pvt. Ltd.
Central Public Works Department
Advance EPC Contracts Pvt. Ltd.
Central Public Works Department
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
