The High Court allowed an exemption application in W.P.(C) 1399/2019. The appellant's petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the court for relief if aggrieved.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn subject to liberty to approach the court for relief if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
BABRIA BHARAT AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Javed Akhtar, Advocate. versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi and Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 11.02.2019 CM APPL. 6374/2019 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1399/2019
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
SANJEEV NARULA, J.
FEBRUARY 11, 2019/ nk
BABRIA BHARAT AND ORS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
S.MURALIDHAR
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
