Disposed

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Delhi HC7 Feb 2019W.P.(C)/2279/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition by consent, setting aside the petitioner's property tax assessment order. The respondent was directed to issue a fresh communication for document submission, accord a hearing, and make a fresh assessment within three months from the date.

What did the court decide?

Assessment order dated 04.01.2018 set aside; respondent directed to issue fresh notice, grant hearing, and make new assessment within three months.

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development… — Landlord and Tenant | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) No. 2279/2018 & CM APPL. No. 9432/2018 DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Standing Counsel, DSIIDC with Ms.Nikita Salwan, Advocates.

¶4

versus

¶5

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Madhu Tewatia and Mr. Adhirath Singh, Advocates.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R

¶8

% 07.02.2019

¶9

The petitioner is aggrieved by the issuance of a suo moto assessment order dated 04.01.2018 by the respondent/North DMC, whereby the petitioner/Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd was assessed to property tax by the respondent.

¶10

The petitioner’s main contention is that the petitioner-corporation has been allotted the subject land by the Government of NCT of Delhi, which land is presently vacant, but in any case, the petitioner is not owner of the land.

¶11

In this background, the petitioner has sought quashing of assessment order dated 04.01.2018 made by the respondent.

¶12

Ms. Madhu Tewatia, learned Special Counsel appearing for the respondent states that suo moto assessment order dated 04.01.2018 came to be made since certain documents that were required by the respondent were

¶13

not made available by the petitioner. She further states that assessment order dated 04.01.2018 may be set-aside by the court ; and that the respondent will issue a fresh communication to the petitioner calling upon the petitioner to submit the requisite documents, whereupon the petitioner will be granted a hearing and a fresh assessment order relating to property tax will be made.

¶14

This position is acceptable to Ms. Anusuya Salwan, learned Standing Counsel for the petitioner/DSIIDC.

¶15

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, by consent of parties, with the following directions:

¶16

(i) Assessment order dated 04.01.2018 in respect of the subject property is hereby set-aside;

¶17

(ii) Respondent/North DMC shall issue to the petitioner a fresh communication calling upon it to supply such documents as may be necessary for undertaking a fresh property tax assessment for the subject land ;

¶18

(iii) Respondent/North DMC shall also accord to the petitioner an opportunity of hearing in relation to the proposed assessment;

¶19

(iv) Respondent/North DMC shall thereafter make a fresh assessment order in relation to the subject land.

¶20

The above exercise shall be completed within three months from

¶21

today.

¶22

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶23

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.

¶24

FEBRUARY 07, 2019/ Pallavi

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jorawar Singh through Lrs. Vs Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Ltd.

Smt. Ruchi Aggarwal Vs the Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors.

Udai Singh Yadav Vs Kendriya Vidalaya Sanghtan & Anr.

Sandeep Kumar Vs Union of India & Anr.

Union of India & Ors. Vs U K Goel

Mumtaz Bano Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Vs Union of India

Subhram Vs Sh. Pawan Singh and Anr.

R. K. Gandhi and Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Ms Anu Chakrabarty Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Sh. Shiv Shankar Gupta Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs Oriental Bank of Commerce and Anr.

Gaurav Goel Vs Indian Overseas Bank

Rizwan Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.