Dismissed

Subhram v. Sh. Pawan Singh and Anr.

Delhi HC8 Feb 2019W.P.(C)/1301/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge disposed of a writ petition alleging unauthorized construction. Citing recent Division Bench orders and Supreme Court directives, the Court held that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the newly constituted Special Task Force under DDA, directing the petitioner to file a complaint there.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to approach the Special Task Force constituted by DDA; writ petition disposed of.

Subhram Vs Sh. Pawan Singh and Anr. — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~46

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) No. 1301/2019

¶4

SUBHRAM ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. N. Prabhakar, Mr. Dhruv Sharma & Ms. Soumya Das, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

SH. PAWAN SINGH AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh & Mr. Mohd. Kaisar Ansari, Advs. for R2.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 08.02.2019 CM APPL. No. 5890/2019 (for exemption)

¶10

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(C) No. 1301/2019 & CM APPL. No. 5891/2019 (for interim relief)

¶13

The petitioner is aggrieved by alleged unauthorised construction in property bearing No. WZ 39 Village Dashghara, New Delhi.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that despite repeated representations to respondent No. 2/North DMC, no action has been forthcoming.

¶15

Mr. Abhinav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2/North DMC appears on advance copy and states that he has no instructions in the matter.

¶16

In the context of the petitioner’s grievance, it transpires that in compliance of orders of the Supreme Court in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677/1985 titled M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India & Ors , vide Office Memorandum dated 25.04.2018 the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) has constituted a Special Task Force to comprehensively address violations of the provisions of the Unified Building Bye Laws and Master Plan for Delhi-2021 relating inter alia to construction activity and land-use in Delhi. Vide another Office Memorandum dated 23.05.2018 the DDA has also formulated an action plan for monitoring construction activities in Delhi and for fixing responsibility in case of violations of the Unified Building Bye Laws and the Master Plan.

¶17

Vide order dated 20.09.2018 made in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1807/2018 titled Devender vs. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (and connected matters) by the Division Bench of this Court presided-over by Hon’ble the Chief Justice, the Court has held that in view of the setting-up of the Special Task Force under directions of the Supreme Court it is not appropriate for our court to exercise jurisdiction in matters relating to unauthorised construction; and has disposed of such matters granting liberty to the petitioners to raise their grievances before the Special Task Force so constituted, in accordance with the scheme and procedure formulated under the aforesaid two Office Memorandums.

¶18

By order dated 24.09.2018 made in a subsequent matter, being Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9938/2018 titled Suresh Chand Goel vs. East Delhi Municipal Corporation , the Division Bench has followed its earlier order dated 20.09.2018 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1807/2018, similarly disposing of the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a complaint

¶19

before the Special Task Force. I am informed that the Division Bench has subsequently also made similar orders in other matters.

¶20

To be sure, the petitions that were subject matter of the aforesaid proceedings before the Division Bench were petitions filed in public interest and otherwise ; and related to contravention not only of sanctioned building plans but also of various laws , including the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, the Delhi Development Authority Act, 1957, the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994, the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 and the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, 1904 as also encroachment on public land etc.

¶21

The aforesaid Special Task Force is a 15-member outfit with representation of the highest level from all concerned municipal, civic, revenue and law enforcement agencies of Delhi; and is therefore ideally suited for multi-agency, coordinated action against the rampant malaise of breach of various laws, rules and regulations governing building construction and land-use in Delhi.

¶22

I am informed that as of date the Special Task Force even has its own dedicated website and mobile application to facilitate making of complaints, thereby making it even easier for parties to take their grievances before the said agency.

¶23

Accordingly, I am of the view that the correct course of action in this matter also would be to dispose of the present writ petition, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Special Task Force in accordance with the policy and procedure laid down for the purpose in DDA’s Office Memorandums dated 25.04.2018 and 23.05.2018 and avail the said alternate, efficacious remedy.

¶24

This petition is disposed of in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶25

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.

¶26

FEBRUARY 08, 2019/ uj

Subhram v. Sh. Pawan Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhram v. Sh. Pawan Singh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aircon Technique Pvt. Ltd. Vs Central Public Works Department and Ors.

Akhil Dabas Vs Sub-Registar,Gnct of Delhi

Manish Kumar Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Sarvesh Tyagi Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Babria Bharat and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sh. Rajbir Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Usha Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Dr. Noor Yahya Abed Al-Jubory and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs Oriental Bank of Commerce and Anr.

Gaurav Goel Vs Indian Overseas Bank

Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Mumtaz Bano Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Mazhar Ali and Anr. Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Dr. Damodar Shastri Vs South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.