This interlocutory order records the appearance of recipients appearing and the ascertainment of factual position in two writ petitions filed by Manish Kumar and Sanjay Kumar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27 & 28
versus
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. ..... Respondents
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR
..... Respondents
Ms.Jyoti Taneja, standing counsel for North DMC/R-1 in item no.28.
Mr.Jamal Akhtar, Advocate for R-2/SHO in item no.28.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 11.01.2019
Counsels for the respondents have entered appearance and wish to ascertain the factual position.
List on 23.01.2019.
G.S.SISTANI, J
VINOD GOEL, J
JANUARY 11, 2019/ rb /
Manish Kumar
Sanjay Kumar
New Delhi Municipal Council
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
G.S. Sistani
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
