The High Court of Delhi disposed of an appeal that was settled between parties through a Memorandum of Understanding, accepting the agreement and leaving parties to fulfill reciprocal obligations.
Recipe obligations acknowledged; appeal disposed as settled; pending application disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PULKIT SHARMA
..... Appellant
Through Mr. Prashant Kr. Mittal, Advocate along with appellant in person.
versus
NEHA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abhimanyu Walia, Advocate along with respondent in person.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 18.05.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant states that the underlying dispute between the parties has been amicably settled vide terms and conditions contained in a Memorandum of Understanding dated 17th March, 2018. A copy of the said Memorandum of Understanding has been handed over in the Court today. The same is taken on record and exhibited as Ex.C-1.
Learned counsel, therefore, pray that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the said Memorandum of Understanding.
We have perused the agreement arrived at between the parties. The agreement arrived at between the parties is lawful and the same is hereby accepted leaving the parties to comply with their reciprocal obligations, without demur.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 59/2017
page 1 of 2
The appeal is disposed of as having been settled. Pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 18, 2018 RS
page 2 of 2
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 59/2017
Pulkit Sharma
Neha Sharma
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
