This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
| + W.P.(C) 420/2018 1775/2018, 1 |
776/2018, 1797/2018 1798/2018 |
|---|---|
| VINEET KHOSLA | ..... Petitioner |
| Through: versus LD. RECOVERY OFFICER (I |
None ), DRT |
| (III), & ORS | ..... Respondent |
| Through: | Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates for R-1, R-4, R-5, R-8, R-9 & R-10 |
| Mr. Ashish Rana and Mr. Anurag Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-2 |
|
| Mr. R.P. Agrawal, Mr. Sunny Verma and Mr. Narender Singh, Advocates for R-3 |
|
| Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. | |
| R.D. Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr. Harshul | |
| Choudhary, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Sahil Sood, Advocates for R-12 |
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 16.05.2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the second call. There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner at the first call either.
The petitioner does not seem to be keen to prosecute the present petition.
The petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. The pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 16, 2018/ dn
Vineet Khosla
LD. Recovery Officer (I), DRT (III) & ORS
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
