No substantive text explaining the exemption application or review petition rationale. The order dismisses the review petition and allows the exemption subject to exceptions without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~SB-1
SEEMA SHUKLA ..... Respondent Through Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Advocate along with respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 16.11.2018
CM No. 29833/2018 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
Review Pet. No. 286/2018 (under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 7 3, read with Section 151 CPC, 1908, seeking review of the order dated 22nd May, 2018, passed in Mat. App. (F.C.) 121/2018.
Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, we are of the view that, he has been unable to show any ground for review of the order dated 22nd May, 2018, passed by this Court.
The review petition is accordingly dismissed.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018/ RS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant has shown any ground for review of the order dated 22nd May, 2018.
Whether the exemption application or review petition allows relief.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Shukla
Seema Shukla
Siddharth Mridul
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 against a decree or order of a Family Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
