Pushpendra v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed the petitioner's plea for parole, releasing him on personal bond with conditions to report weekly and not disturb law and order, noting previous conduct and tenure served.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on parole for three weeks on personal bond of Rs.5000/- with one surety, subject to reporting to SHO weekly.
What the court decided
$~20
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 41/2018 PUSHPENDRA
| Through | Mr.Pramod Ms.Namita |
Kumar Wali, Advo |
..... Petitioner Dubey and cates. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| versus | ||||
| STATE | Through | Mr.Rahul with Mr.Ja ASI Tulsi Badarpur. |
Mehra, Sta mal Akhtar, Ram from |
..... Respondent nding Counsel Adv. for State. Police station |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 08.01.2018
Petitioner is seeking parole for the reasons mentioned in the petition. One reason is that he wishes to repair his house and the second is that he wants to reconnect himself with the society and establish his roots in the society. The Competent Authority has rejected his plea on the ground that there is apprehension that the convict may create a law and order situation in the State where he is living (U.P.). He has recently availed of furlough. The last furlough availed of by the convict was between07.10.2017 to 21.10.2017.
On advance notice, learned counsel for the State has put in appearance. Status report has been filed. The apprehension that the
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is a fit case for grant of parole.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PUSHPENDRA KUMAR WALI
- respondent
STATE
Coram
INDERMEET KAUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court