This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
DHAIRYA SHARMA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv.
versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI O R D E R % 05.01.2018
C.M. No.28968/2017 (for directions)
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that though the petitioners had been permitted to participate in the counselling, they were rejected in the same.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this application. The same is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
REKHA PALLI, J
JANUARY 05, 2018/aa
Dhairya Sharma & Anr
University of Delhi & Ors
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
