Petitioner sought permission to withdraw his writ petition. Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
..... Respondents Through: Mr Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms Madhuri Dhingra, Adv for UOI Mr Sanjay Lao, Adv for R-2&3 SI Pawan Kumar PS Subzi Mandi
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 08.01.2018
This petition is listed for its maintainability. After some arguments the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present petition.
Permission granted with additional liberty to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
INDERMEET KAUR, J
JANUARY 08, 2018 SU
Gautam K Dutta
Union of India & Ors
Indermeet Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
