Allowed
Kalu @ Rajinder v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/1984/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~72
KALU @ RAJINDER
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sumer Sethi & Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advs.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent Through: SI Vijay Kumar, P.S. Mayur Vihar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 09.07.2018
On 31.01.2018, the petitioner was granted Furlough for a period of three weeks from the date of his release with one of the conditions requiring him to furnish a Personal Bond of Rs.10,000/with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Superintendent Jail. The petitioner seeks modification of the same to one surety of the like amount. The relief sought is reasonable. Hence, it is allowed. The petitioner shall be released on his furnishing a Personal Bond of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of the like amount. The other conditions of the Furlough shall remain unaltered.
The petition is allowed in the above terms.
A copy of this order shall be given dasti, to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master for communication to the petitioner and his release. A copy of the same be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent through the police for release of the petitioner.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
JULY 09, 2018/acm
KALU @ RAJINDER
STATE
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court