Manoj Kumar Gupta v. State & Anr.

30# $~

* IN THE HIGH	COURT OF DE	LHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 434/2	017
MANOJ KUMAR	GUPTA & ANR Represented by: versus	..... Petitioners Mr. Ashish Middha, Advocate with petitioners in person.
STATE & ANR.	Represented by:	..... Respondents Ms. Suman Saharan, Advocate for Mr.R.S. Kundu, Additional Standing Counsel for State with Inspector Subhash Chand, DIU/West. Mr. Bhupesh Narula and Mr. Rinku Narula, Advocates for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R % 10.07.2018

By the present petition the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 290/2016 under Sections 420/406/506/120B/34 IPC registered at PS Khyala, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.

Learned proxy counsel for learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instructions from Investigating Officer submits that in the above-noted FIR the two petitioners as named in the amended memo of parties are the only accused and the respondent No. 2 the complainant/victim.

W.P.(CRL) 434/2017

Respondent No. 2 is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel. He states that he has settled the matter with the petitioners vide Settlement Agreement dated 13^th December, 2016, copy of which is annexed as Annexure-B to the present petition. He further states that in terms of the settlement he has received a total sum of ₹25 lakhs and now he has no claims whatsoever remaining against the petitioners. He also states that he does not wish to pursue the above-noted FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto and will abide by the terms of settlement.