Court disposed of writ petition where petitioner complained about lack of investigation into allegation against police officer seeking gratification. State submitted investigation by Vigilance Branch is complete with chargesheet filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State. Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms. Priyanka Singh, Advocate for UOI. Mr. R.R. Khatana, ACP/Vigilance.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 10.07.2018
It is the petitioner’s grievance that despite specific allegations made by him, his complaint dated 06.01.2014 recording the demand of gratification by a certain police officer, no investigation had been initiated by the respondents. The learned counsel for the State submits, upon instructions, that pursuant to the case being transferred to the Vigilance Branch, which is a specialized unit of Delhi Police, the issue has been investigated extensively, a FIR was registered and as of 7th July, 2018 the chargesheet had been filed in the court seized of the matter.
In view of the above, no further orders are required in this petition at this stage.
The petition is disposed-off in the above terms.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
JULY 10, 2018 RW
HARDEEP SINGH
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
