The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition stating it had become infructuous. The High Court of Delhi allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
MANJEET SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohd. Azam Ansari, Advocate. versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor alogwith Mr. Ashish Negi, Advocate with Insp. Usha Sharma, PS-Hari Nagar. Mr. Sunil Fernandis, Standing Counsel for BSES with Ms. Anju Thomas, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 06.07.2018
The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has become infructuous and he would like to withdraw it.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
JULY 06, 2018/acm
Manjeet Singh
State of NCT of Delhi
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
