Petitioner counsel entered appearance and noted respondents' assurance to proceed as per law; no further orders required and the petition disposed-off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
SUICH INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. Sarbjit Sharma and Ms. Leeza Taneja, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Agarwala, Advocate for Respondents No. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 06.07.2018
Mr. Agarwala, the learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3 submits that the petitioner’s apprehensions are unfounded and the respondents No. 2 and 3 are bound to proceed as per law and they shall do so.
In view of the said assurance, no further orders are required at this stage.
The petition, alongwith pending application, stands disposed-off accordingly.
JULY 06, 2018 NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner enters appearance and has been apprised of the order.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
JULY 06, 2018/ sb
SUICH INDUSTRIES LTD.
UNION OF INDIA
NAJMI WAZIRI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
