The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition for quashing of an FIR based on a settlement, with liberty to file a fresh petition on merits. This request was granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal principle was propounded.
Leave and liberty to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
SANDEEP ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Vikas Khatri, Advocate
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ranbir Singh Kundu, ASC for the State with Ms.Suman Saharan, Advocate and SI Sumitra Sharma, PS Punjabi Bagh
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 09.07.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset seeks leave to withdraw the present petition seeking quashing of FIR No.21/2018 under Sections 376/323/506 IPC registered at PS Punjabi Bagh on the ground of settlement with liberty to file a fresh petition seeking quashing of abovenoted FIR on merits.
Leave and liberty granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JULY 09, 2018 mamta
Sandeep
State (NCT of Delhi)
Mukta Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
