Disposed
Chander Kanta & Anr. v. State & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/1754/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
CHANDER KANTA & ANR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Nishant Anand, Ms. Shilpa Diwan, Advs.
versus
STATE & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Jitender PS K.N. Katju Marg.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R % 14.03.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition stating that presently the petitioners have no grievance against the respondent No.3.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, SHO PS K.N. Katju Marg is directed to ensure that as and when a complaint received from the petitioners against respondent No.3, action thereon be taken in accordance with law.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 14, 2018
‘ga’
CHANDER KANTA & ANR
STATE & ORS
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court