Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR regarding sexual offences but sought and was granted leave to withdraw the petition, which was then dismissed.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
70# $~
HARI SHANKAR BHARTI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Hari Paakash, Advocate.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Virender Kumar, PS K.N. Katju Marg.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Crl. M.A. No. 4818/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 767/2018
By this petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 505/2016 under Sections 328/376/506/377/323 IPC and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.
Leave granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 15, 2018/‘vn’
HARI SHANKAR BHARTI
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
