Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR based on settlement but later withdrew the petition. The court dismissed the petition on the basis that it was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~49
PARAM VEER ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv.
versus
STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for Ms. Kamna Vohra, ASC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Crl.M.A. 4657/2018
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(CRL) 751/2018
By this petition the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.152/2017 under Sections 279/304A IPC registered at PS Jagatpuri on the basis that parties have settled the matter.
After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 13, 2018 ‘ga’
PARAM VEER
STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
