Arjun v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Banktla Court of High Court, Delhi granted a temporary periodic parole of four weeks to a convict under POCSO (2012) pending filing of a Special Leave Petition, subject to personal bond and appearance conditions.
What did the court decide?
Granted temporary periodic parole for four weeks subject to a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/-, one surety, and conditions of surrender and appearance before the concerned SHO every Monday.
What the court decided
$~3
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 573/2018 ARJUN
| Through | ..... Petitioner Ms.Padma Priya, Advocate. |
|
|---|---|---|
| versus | ||
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Through | Mr.Premsagar Pal and Ms.Suman Saharan for Mr.R.S.Kundu, ASC for the State. |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR O R D E R % 13.03.2018
Status report has been filed by the State. The address of the petitioner at Bihar has been verified. The nominal roll of the petitioner reflects that the petitioner is a convict under Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012. His appeal has been disposed of by this Court on 27.01.2017. The sentence awarded to him by the Trial Court of RI for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 1 month has been confirmed. The petitioner as on 07.02.2018 has undergone incarceration of about more than 3½ years which included the remissions earned by him. His jail conduct is satisfactory. The reason for seeking parole has been mentioned in the petition. One such reason is to file an SLP against the dismissal of his appeal by
this Court which was in January, 2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arjun
- respondent
State
Coram
Indermeet Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court