The High Court of Delhi disposed of a withdrawal petition without elaboration, noting it as infructuous and subsequently disposing of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
HAJI IMRAN ALAM SHAIKH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikram Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Raktim Gogoi and Mr.Rishi Sehgal, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC for R-1 & R-2 Mr.Satish Aggarwala, Advocate for DRI
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
O R D E R % 13.03.2018
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
I.S. MEHTA, J.
MARCH 13, 2018/ sr
HAJI IMRAN ALAM SHAIKH
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
S. MURALIDHAR
I.S. MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
