The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition. The درخواست was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn, disposing of the matter.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
ANAND ROOPAK KATHPALIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Duggal, Advocate
versus
WG CDR R K MAHESHWARI (RETD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra and Mr. Rishu Kant Sharma, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
%
16.07.2018
Mr. Gaurav Duggal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Leave granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 16, 2018 dn
Anand Roopak Kathpalia
WG CDR R K Maheshwari (Retd)
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
