Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition regarding an order by the Delhi Development Authority with liberty to challenge it. The court granted leave and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to assail the dated order was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
SEEMA SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sangam Kumar and Mr. Shahid Akhtar, Advocates
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
%
13.07.2018
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition, with liberty to assail the order dated 04.12.2014, passed by the Delhi Development Authority, in relation to the subject matter of the present petition.
Leave and liberty granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The pending application also stands disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JULY 13, 2018 dn
Seema Sharma
Delhi Development Authority
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
